Is this a secure Socialist retirement plan?

September 25th, 2009 | by admin |
You Silly Moonbat asked:


We hear daily how many in the 40 to 60 age group are now worried about retirement as they have little to no retirement savings. Many have double in revolving debt then what they have in currant savings.

Is this simply because that while some of us in this age group were working hard and actually putting away for a secure retirement, the rest of them were investing their retirement in Beanie Babies, Lottery tickets and Bingo while working minimal jobs and living off US Government entitlements their whole life?

Minnie

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • De.lirio.us
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

Related posts:

  1. What is the big fuss about gambling in Ohio?
  2. Enhance Your Lottery Winning Odds By Joining A Syndicate
  3. What if i dont have 40 points for Social Security when I retire? Do i still get anything?
  4. UK National Lottery
  5. Online Bingo Games: Experience the Excitement and Have Fun

  1. 5 Responses to “Is this a secure Socialist retirement plan?”

  2. By John S on Sep 25, 2009 | Reply

    Albert

    the question sounds rhetorical, but sadly is true in some cases.

  3. By pit_team on Sep 28, 2009 | Reply

    Carol

    Yes I thought of it while picking lotto numbers

    Why earn what someone well give you

  4. By B.Kevorkian on Oct 1, 2009 | Reply

    Carol

    No, it’s not. It’s because the Social(ist) (in)Security system is a ponzi scheme, and becomes insolvent in the absence of constantly & geometrically growing population. It’s not because the ‘Boomers didn’t save for thier retirement that they’re facing a grim future – it’s because they didn’t have nearly enough kids.

  5. By End the 2-Party Duopoly on Oct 2, 2009 | Reply

    James

    Young people are putting money into Social Security that they will never have apportioned to them. Young people should demand their money back and demand the right to not pay social security.

  6. By RayN-here on Oct 5, 2009 | Reply

    Ethel

    I’ve just foreclosed on raw land The person as bought 3 house next to this land with the wild idea of tearing them down and building million dollar homes He has lost the 3 homes as well I fig. he has lost two million dollars about half from his pocket the rest to the banks I’ll bet the farm he does not think he as done one thing wrong

Post a Comment